Global Warming, Global Myth

"If they do not announce disasters, no one will hear."

- Sir John Houghton, the first President of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), and the liberalization of the first three reports.


During the 20th century, the warming of 0.6 degrees Celsius (1 degree Fahrenheit), but this warming has been wiped out in one year with a decrease of 0.63 degrees Celsius (1.13 F) in 2007. A common one is not a reversal of the trend, but the size of the drop in temperature - the equivalent of 100 years of warming - negligible. And, of course, could also be argued that a mere 0.6 degree warming in the century, so small that it should not be considered cause for alarm in the first place. How then can the idea of global warming are being sold to the public? In any case, global cooling was evident in more than one year. Decreased global temperatures since 1998. At the same time, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has gone in the other direction, which increases 15-20%. This difference casts doubt on the validity of the greenhouse hypothesis, but this has not discouraged advocates of global warming. Have for a long time to ignore the greatest proof that the basic premise of global warming from increased carbon dioxide is false.

Man-made emissions of carbon dioxide are not large in all parts of the world before the start of industrialization in the 1940s. It has grown steadily since then. More than 80% of the 20th century, an increase of carbon dioxide occurred after 1940 - but the bulk of the increase in temperature in the century occurred before 1940! From 1940 until the mid-1970s, also failed to act in the climate, according to the theory of global warming, carbon dioxide strongly increase the temperature in the world while it cools. This led to a cooling countless scare stories in the media about a meeting and the start of a new Ice Age.

In the past 1.6 million years there were 63 rotations between warm and cold climates, and not evidence that any of them were due to changes in the levels of carbon dioxide. A recent study of a much longer period (600 million years) shows - without exception - that temperature changes precede changes in carbon dioxide levels, not vice verse. As the earth warms the land and ocean lead to more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, because warmer water, which can not hold as much carbon dioxide as colder water.

The public was to believe that the increase in carbon dioxide resulting from human activities cause global warming is heating the planet. However, the amount of carbon dioxide, 0,035% of the atmosphere, is very weak greenhouse gas. Although it is widely blamed for global warming, not only of the greenhouse gases, or even more important. Water vapor is a greenhouse gas and accounts for a period of not less than 95% of any greenhouse gases. Carbon dioxide constitutes only about 3%, and the remainder due to methane and other gases.

Not only carbon dioxide is the sum of a small greenhouse effect, and the contribution of mankind is small. The vast majority (97%) of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere comes from nature, not man-made. Volcanoes, and wetlands, rice paddies, fallen leaves, even insects and bacteria produce carbon dioxide, as well as methane. According to the magazine Science (November 5, 1982), and termites alone emit ten times the carbon dioxide from factories and cars all around the world. More natural wetlands, emits greenhouse gases from all human activities combined. (And, if global warming is the problem, why are we trying to save all the wetlands?) Geothermal activity in Yellowstone National Park emitted ten times the carbon dioxide medium-sized coal-burning to generate electricity, volcanoes emit hundreds of times. In fact, we are in the composition of the atmosphere mainly as a result of volcanic activity. There are about 100 active volcanoes today, mostly in remote areas, and we live in a period of relative decline in volcanic activity. There were times when volcanic activity was ten times higher than in the modern era. But so far the largest source of carbon dioxide emissions is the equatorial region of the Pacific Ocean. Produces 72% of the land of the carbon dioxide emissions, and the rest of the Pacific and the Atlantic Ocean and the Indian Ocean, and also contribute in other oceans. Human contribution to such a shadow of much larger sources of carbon dioxide. Combination of factors of nature and the production of water vapor, carbon dioxide, we see that 99.8% of the greenhouse effect has nothing to do with carbon dioxide emissions resulting from human activity. How can we organize a big impact small impact on the rest of the world's climate, carbon dioxide, even if climate determined?

Because carbon dioxide is very low greenhouse gas emissions, and computer models predicted an environmental disaster depends on a small amount of carbon dioxide warming is being amplified by increased evaporation of water. But in the many documented periods of elevated carbon dioxide concentrations, even during periods of warming climate is much, and that it had never occurred. During the time of the dinosaurs, and the carbon dioxide levels greater than 300-500% today. Five hundred million years, and the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere 15-20 times what it is today. After the catastrophic amplification of water vapor and carbon dioxide in warming did not happen at all. Today we are facing a catastrophic warming will lead to carbon dioxide in the case of doubles. However, during the Ordovician, and the carbon dioxide level of 12 times what it is today, and the land was in the Ice Age. This is exactly the opposite of a "runaway" warming that computer models predict should happen. It is clear that models which rely on the erroneous assumption that the amplification is contrary millions of years of climate record. There is no reason to trust computer-based predictions or public policies concerning them. Reid Bryson, founding chairman of the Committee of the Department of Meteorology at the University of Wisconsin, said, "You can go outside and spit and have the same effect as doubling carbon dioxide."